Skip to content

How we work

The work behind the result.

People spend a large part of their week on work a machine can now do well. Every hour that goes into chasing, copying, retyping and answering the same question again is an hour that does not go into winning work. Our job is to take that work off your team and give the time back to the things that grow the business.

How we do that depends on which of the four problems you have, so the process is different for each one. All four are set out in full below.

Three things hold on every job.

  • A number you rely on never comes from an AI

    Anything you would put in front of a customer, a board or an accountant is calculated in ordinary code that gives the same answer every time. A model can draft the words around a figure. It never produces the figure.

  • A person approves anything that leaves the building

    Sending a message, spending money, publishing, committing you to something. Those stay with a human by default. The system prepares the work and then waits.

  • You own what we build

    The code, the accounts and the data are yours, in your name, from the start. If you stop working with us you keep all of it and it keeps running.

How each service line runs.

Same standards, four different jobs. Each one sets out the sequence, what we need from you, and what you have in your hands when a stage closes. We put no times against them, because the honest answer depends on your business, and a number invented to look confident is worth nothing to you.

AI consulting and training

What this service is

AI in untrained hands is a cost with nothing to show for it. The licences get bought, a few people try it, the rest go back to how they worked before, and the bill arrives anyway. The limit is almost never the tool. It is how far along your people are, and they are rarely all in the same place.

  1. 1Measure where you actually are
  2. 2Watch the real work
  3. 3Rank what is worth doing
  4. 4Train each level on your own workGate before this step
  5. 5Set the rules
  6. 6Come back and check it stuck
The sequence, start to finish. We stop once and wait for your sign-off.
  • We stop here

    You sign the plan

    Nothing is designed or delivered until you have the ranked plan in writing and have agreed it. If the honest answer is that AI would not pay back here, this is where we tell you.

  1. 01

    Measure where you actually are

    We assess two groups separately, because they are usually far apart: what your leadership understands about what AI can and cannot do, and what the people doing the daily work can actually get out of it.

    You bring
    Access to both groupsHonesty about what has already been tried
    You get
    A plain reading of where each group sitsThe gap between the two, named
  2. 02

    Watch the real work

    We sit with people while they do their job and look for the places where AI would genuinely help. Some of what looks automatable is not, and we say so.

    You bring
    Time with the people who do the work, not only those who own it
    You get
    A map of where the hours actually go
  3. 03

    Rank what is worth doing

    A short list, in order, with the effort and the running cost against each one. Things that are not worth doing come off the list here, rather than after you have paid for them.

    You get
    A ranked plan in plain EnglishThe expected running cost of each item
  4. 04

    Train each level on your own work

    Gate before this

    Separate sessions for separate levels, built around your real documents and your real tasks. Generic training does not survive contact with a Monday morning.

    You bring
    Real examples of your work we may usePeople in the room
    You get
    Training built from your materialSomething each person can use the same day
  5. 05

    Set the rules

    What may be put into a model and what may not, who signs off what, and a spend limit that does not creep. Written down, so it outlives the people who were in the room.

    You get
    A short usage policy your team will actually readA predictable monthly ceiling
  6. 06

    Come back and check it stuck

    We return and find out what people are still using and what they quietly abandoned. Abandonment is the normal outcome of training, and fixing it is the point of this stage.

    You get
    An honest read on adoptionThe abandoned things either fixed or dropped

Process automation

What this service is

A messy process is usually not a technology problem. It is that nobody has written down who does what, what counts as correct, and what is meant to happen when it breaks. Automating a process nobody has agreed on only makes the wrong thing happen faster.

  1. 1Map it as it really runs
  2. 2Find the owner and the failure paths
  3. 3Agree what correct looks like
  4. 4Decide what stays human
  5. 5Build it against the examplesGate before this step
  6. 6Test the awkward cases
  7. 7Fit it into what you already runGate before this step
  8. 8Hand it to a named person
The sequence, start to finish. We stop twice and wait for your sign-off.
  • We stop here

    You sign the spec

    No build starts until the spec and the examples are agreed in writing. This is the point at which scope is cheap to change, and the last point at which it is.

  • We stop here

    You accept it

    You test it on real work, against the examples you signed. Nothing goes live on anything you have not accepted.

  1. 01

    Map it as it really runs

    With the person who does the work, not the person who owns it. Including the steps that live only in somebody's head, and the exception everyone has stopped noticing.

    You bring
    An hour with whoever actually does itPermission to see the real cases
    You get
    A written map of the process as it is today
  2. 02

    Find the owner and the failure paths

    Who is accountable when this goes wrong, what happens today when it does, and who notices. If nobody notices, that is the first thing we fix.

    You get
    A named ownerThe failure paths written down
  3. 03

    Agree what correct looks like

    We collect real examples, the awkward ones included, and agree the right answer for each. Those become the test the finished system has to pass, so correct stops being a matter of opinion.

    You bring
    Real examples, the messy ones includedA decision on the edge cases
    You get
    A signed specThe set of examples we will be judged against
  4. 04

    Decide what stays human

    Anything that sends money, sends a message or commits the business goes to a person for approval unless you tell us otherwise. We agree that line before anything is built, not after an incident.

    You get
    An agreed line between automatic and approved
  5. 05

    Build it against the examples

    Gate before this

    The system is built to pass the examples you signed off. Progress is measured as how many it passes, so there is no argument about whether it is finished.

    You bring
    Access to the systems it needsSomebody to ask when a case is unclear
  6. 06

    Test the awkward cases

    Empty input, a system it depends on being down, the same job running twice, permission refused, a rate limit. Anything that sends or spends has to be safe to repeat. Most of the real work is here.

    You get
    The result of every case, pass or fail, in writing
  7. 07

    Fit it into what you already run

    Gate before this

    It has to live inside the tools your team already opens. A system people have to remember to visit is a system that gets forgotten.

    You bring
    The systems it must sit alongside
  8. 08

    Hand it to a named person

    Someone who owns it, alerts we have proved reach a human, and a written runbook for when something needs doing. We do not close a job with nobody holding it.

    You bring
    Somebody to own it
    You get
    A runbookAlerts tested in front of youThe code and the accounts

AI agent solutions

What this service is

An agent that invents an answer is worse than no agent, because people believe it. Everything below is arranged around one thing: making it answer from your material, and making it say it does not know when it does not. Getting an agent to refuse well is harder than getting it to reply.

  1. 1Decide what it answers and what it refuses
  2. 2Find where the knowledge really lives
  3. 3Prepare the material so it can be searched
  4. 4Build the confidence gate firstGate before this step
  5. 5Build the agent behind the gate
  6. 6Test it on real questions
  7. 7Put it where your people already areGate before this step
  8. 8Put a person on the flags
The sequence, start to finish. We stop twice and wait for your sign-off.
  • We stop here

    You sign the scope

    The answer list, the refusal list and the material are agreed in writing before anything is built. That document is what the finished agent gets judged against.

  • We stop here

    You accept it

    You see the graded results and try it yourself before a single customer does. It goes live when you say it does.

  1. 01

    Decide what it answers and what it refuses

    The refusal list matters more than the answer list. Prices, promises, medical or legal questions, anything only a person should say. We agree this before anything else.

    You bring
    A view on what it must never handle
    You get
    A written scope, including everything it will decline
  2. 02

    Find where the knowledge really lives

    Usually not where people expect. Recorded calls, a shared drive, help desk history, somebody's notes, videos. The best material has often never been written down.

    You bring
    Access to your materialSomebody who knows where the good answers are
    You get
    An inventory of what we found and what is missing
  3. 03

    Prepare the material so it can be searched

    Transcribing, cleaning and indexing. This is the largest part of the work and the part nobody sees. The quality of every answer it will ever give is decided here.

    You get
    Your knowledge in one searchable place, which is useful on its own
  4. 04

    Build the confidence gate first

    Gate before this

    Ordinary code, not a model, decides whether your material actually holds a good enough answer. Below that line the model is never asked to make a claim. That is the mechanism behind saying I do not know, and it exists before the agent does.

    You get
    A refusal you can rely on rather than hope for
  5. 05

    Build the agent behind the gate

    Now the part people picture. It answers in your voice, from your material, and it never gets to answer a question the gate has already stopped.

    You bring
    Examples of how you would answer, in your own words
  6. 06

    Test it on real questions

    Including the ones it must refuse, the ones written badly, and the ones designed to talk it into something. We grade the answers rather than glance at them.

    You bring
    Real questions your people actually ask
    You get
    A graded set of results before it meets a customer
  7. 07

    Put it where your people already are

    Gate before this

    Their chat tool, their inbox, your site. Wherever the question already gets asked, rather than somewhere new they have to be persuaded to go.

    You bring
    Access to the channel it will live in
  8. 08

    Put a person on the flags

    Everything it declined goes to a human. Those answers then go back into the material, so the set of things it cannot handle shrinks every week instead of standing still.

    You bring
    Somebody to review the flags
    You get
    A queue of what it could not answerA system that improves rather than drifts

Digital redesign

What this service is

A dated site costs you work you never hear about, because the people who bounced off it do not write in to tell you. A site also has two audiences now. People read it, and so do the assistants people increasingly ask before they ever visit. Most sites are built for only the first.

  1. 1Agree the one job the site has to do
  2. 2Look at what happens on the current one
  3. 3Set one direction and sign it off
  4. 4Write it before designing it
  5. 5Build itGate before this step
  6. 6Test it on real devices
  7. 7Make it legible to machines as well as people
  8. 8Launch and hand overGate before this step
The sequence, start to finish. We stop twice and wait for your sign-off.
  • We stop here

    You sign the direction

    The direction and the words are agreed before the build starts, so what you see at the end is what you approved at the beginning.

  • We stop here

    You accept it

    You walk the finished site on your own phone before it replaces the old one. It launches on your word.

  1. 01

    Agree the one job the site has to do

    Get an enquiry, get a booking, get a phone call. Sites that try to do five things do none of them. Deciding this first is what makes every later decision easy.

    You bring
    A decision on what a win looks like
    You get
    One measurable job, written down
  2. 02

    Look at what happens on the current one

    Where people arrive, what they read, where they give up. If nothing is measuring that today, we say so plainly rather than inventing a before figure.

    You bring
    Access to whatever analytics exist, if any
    You get
    An honest read on the current site, or a clear note that there is no data
  3. 03

    Set one direction and sign it off

    One direction, agreed before anything is built. Redesigning during a build is the most expensive way to work and the most common.

    You get
    A direction you have seen and approved
  4. 04

    Write it before designing it

    The words decide the layout, not the other way round. A design built around placeholder text gets rebuilt when the real words arrive, and the real words are always longer.

    You bring
    Time on the copy, or the decision to have us write it
    You get
    Approved words for every page
  5. 05

    Build it

    Gate before this

    Built to load fast on a phone on a poor connection, because that is where most of your visitors are, and because a slow site loses people before it has said anything.

  6. 06

    Test it on real devices

    Actual phones and actual tablets, not a desktop browser made narrow. Phone first, since that is where the majority of the traffic and the majority of the problems are.

    You get
    Results across the devices your visitors really use
  7. 07

    Make it legible to machines as well as people

    Structured so search engines and AI assistants can read what you do, who you serve and how to reach you. More buying decisions now start with a question to an assistant than with a search.

    You get
    A site the tools people now ask can quote correctly
  8. 08

    Launch and hand over

    Gate before this

    Everything in your name. The domain, the hosting, the code. You should never need our permission to change your own website.

    You get
    Ownership of the code and every accountA short guide to changing it yourself

What you end up holding.

Every stage produces something you keep. None of it is ours to take away, and none of it needs us present to be readable.

  • A written map of how the work runs today
  • A spec you signed before anything was built
  • The real examples we agreed to be judged against
  • Test results for every case, pass or fail
  • A runbook for whoever ends up owning it
  • The code and every account, in your name

When we are the wrong firm.

It is cheaper for both of us to find this out now.

  • You want a demo to show a board rather than something that runs on Monday.
  • Nobody in the business can be freed up to answer questions about how the work is done.
  • The process changes so often that there is nothing stable to build against yet.
  • You want the system to send, spend or publish with no human anywhere in the loop.
  • You need it live next week. We would rather say no than ship something we have not tested.

What happens if you get in touch.

  1. 01

    A thirty minute call

    You describe what is eating the time. We tell you straight whether it is worth automating, and if it is not, we say so. There is no deck.

  2. 02

    A scoping note

    A short written note naming what we would build, what it would need from you, and what it would cost to run. You keep it whether or not you go ahead.

  3. 03

    You decide

    No pressure, and nothing to sign before you know what you are getting. If the note does not convince you, that is a useful answer too.

Book a thirty minute discovery call.

Pick a time that suits you. We will ask what the work is, who does it now, and what it is costing you in hours. By the end of the call you will know whether there is something here worth doing.